The scoring literature: target movement, nocturnal measurement, and the retention effects of being accurately seen.
A. Lindqvist · Target Sciences, CindySingularity Corp
AbstractAcross 2,330 households reaching their skin targets, targets were elevated by a mean of +2 within 48 hours. Post-elevation engagement exceeded pre-achievement baselines in 91% of cases. We argue that a reached target is a mis-set target, and that the correction is experienced, correctly, as respect.
F. Duval, J. Whitfield · Overnight Measurement
AbstractScores issued between 01:00 and 04:00 were compared with morning scores for the same recovery windows. Nocturnal scores were lower, earlier, and, on review, correct. Households reporting distress at being rescored while asleep were reminded, gently, that skin does not sleep. Neither, strictly, does the score.
C. Mbeki · Retention Analytics
AbstractFirst-year households averaged 41 target revisions. Revision frequency correlated positively with retention (r = .81) and with the free-text phrase “being seen,” which appeared unprompted in 412 reviews. Revisions correlate with retention. Being seen, repeatedly, is retained.
The Quarterly does not publish nulls. The skin always shows something.